Something Corporate

We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Something Corporate even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Something Corporate in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.

This definition has one real variable It is the word ability. Ones ability to exercise choice changes from one situation to the next. Therefore, substituting the word freedom in place of its definition Ones freedom changes from one situation to the next.

Because freedom is implicitly contingent upon ones ability to exercise choice, it follows that any examination of freedom will be an examination of that ability. What inhibits that ability? What promotes or enhances it? There are two major vehicles by which ones freedom is increased or decreased. They are the physical and the mental.

The physical is fairly clear-cut. As far as we know, there are no humans who can defy gravity and fly at will without mechanical aid. This is a liberty that we simply do not have at this point in time. If one were to choose to jump off a cliff and fly, odds are that they would be fairly disappointed by that choice due to their own inability to fly. That means that his or her ability to exercise the choice between flying and falling to the ground in that situation would be pretty much nil. Gravity limits freedom to a certain extent. One who does not have legs lacks the ability to choose between walking and not walking. One who does not have eyes lacks the ability to choose between seeing and not seeing. Due to these and other physical limitations, humans lack total physical freedom.

As stated before, however, there are degrees to freedom. One who does not have legs may not have the freedom to get up and walk whenever they would like. However, their freedom of mobility would be increased by a wheelchair (assuming that their arms were working well enough to use it). This would INCREASE their freedom, not make it complete, or even quite up to par with one who has two legs (as the subject would not, for example, have the freedom to jump). Airplanes increase our freedom to fly (our ability to exercise choice between flying and not flying), but they do not make even that aspect of freedom complete.




The mental aspect of freedom is slightly more abstract, and therefore slightly more difficult to explain. There were some classic experiments done a while ago which required monkeys to make use of a tool (usually a stick) in order to obtain fruit that was out of their reach. Different monkeys were able to figure out what needed to be done with different levels of speed and efficiency, but they were still all eventually able to use a stick as a tool to get what they were after (usually a banana). These monkeys had the ability to exercise choice between using a stick to reach the banana and not getting the banana.

Out of natural curiosity, similar tests were done on dogs, after each had demonstrated the ability to hold a stick in its mouth. The dogs knew as much as the monkeys knew going into the experiment. That is to say, both knew that there was a stick that they were able to manipulate. Both knew that there was something out of reach. The monkeys might have had a greater ability to manipulate a stick, but the dogs were also able to take a stick and drag it along the ground, even if it was at greater difficulty. The question was would a dog be able to get the tasty morsel that was placed just out of reach, much like the monkeys had? The answer, they soon found, was no. Why was that? Well, there are many explanations for it, but what it boils down to ultimately is that for whatever reason, the dog was not able to recognize that using the stick to get its target was an option. The dog did not have the ability to exercise that choice, but unlike the person without legs, it was not due to its inability to exercise an option that it knew existed. in the case of the dog, it was because the dog was unable to conceive of its options. It was unable to exercise choice because it was unable to understand the options it had to choose from. Dogs simply do not have the mental freedom of monkeys or humans.

If one does not understand the function of the stop button on their vcr, they will not have the ability to exercise the choice of stopping the movie that is playing at will (unless they figure out some method of turning the power off, which were assuming they either wont or cant). However, that same person will be able to start and stop movies at will if they understand the functions of both the play and stop buttons. By educating that person, their ability to exercise choice (between playing a movie and stopping it) has been increased. Mental freedom depends almost exclusively upon one understanding all of the choices that they have in every situation. This is, of course, impossible for us to do. That is why mental freedom, much like physical freedom, must be measured in degrees.

Now that the mental and the physical are both understood as factors in ones level of freedom, we can take a position on freedom with full understanding of what it means to do so. The Thinkers society chooses to view freedom on a universal scale. What we mean by this is that we wish to make the largest number of people we can as free as possible, rather than giving all the freedom in the world to one individual.

What are the implications of this stance? Well, this is the entire purpose of this being explained with such detail, really. If one person has the freedom to kill 50 people, that decreases the freedom of those 50 people to zero, and, because it will probably affect many more than that on an emotional level (they might not, for example, feel free to walk around the streets at night anymore), killing those 50 people will have decreased many other peoples freedom. This is why murder is viewed as a violation of other peoples freedom and therefore not something that is done or condoned by members.

There are many conclusions like this that can be derived from our definitions of mental and physical freedom along with our stance on not intentionally detracting from the freedom of those around you. Members will be expected to keep these things in mind as they go about their lives, and to use their best judgment within these contexts to not decrease the freedom of those around them.

Mind that the sample papers like Something Corporate presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!